| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 223 |
| 全文下载次数: 33 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：通过分析研究生学位论文盲审结果，探索学位论文分项质量差异，为提高学位论文质量提供参考。方法：样本为某医学院校366篇学位论文1051篇双盲评阅书，根据研究生学位论文评价指标体系，按总体质量和学科门类进行横向比较，采用excell、spss19.0进行数据统计分析。结果：不合格类80%论文选题较差，其规范性优良率仅21%；在学科门类中评价分项“选题”上基础医学组较差率3.8%， “创新性与论文价值” 上军事管理组较差率5.6%，“基础知识与科研能力掌握”上基础医学组较差率2.5%，“论文规范性”上军事管理组较差率1.9%。结论：论文选题是学位论文质量关键，基础医学和军事管理组应提高学位论文选题科学性和论文规范性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective In order to explore the quality difference of dissertations, and to improve the quality of dissertations for providing the evidence of decision-making basis and reference. Methods According to the evaluation index system of postgraduate dissertations, data analysis and horizontal comparison based on total quality and subject categories of 366 dissertations and 1051 double-blind reviews was implemented by excel and spss19.0. Results: 80% of the dissertations in the unqualified category were poorly selected, and the normative rate was only 21%; the poor rate of basic medical group was 3.8% on subject category, the military management group had a poor rate of 5.6% on“innovation and dissertation value”and 1.9% on“normalization”, the basic medical group had 2.5% on“basic knowledge and scientific research ability”. In conclusion: Topic selection is the key to the quality of dissertations, the groups of basic medicine and military management should improve the scientificity of topic selection and normalization |
|
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
