| 基金项目:江苏省期刊协会2017年度立项课题（2017JSQKB21） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 220 |
| 全文下载次数: 24 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 通过对国内20所独立设置医科大学的2013-2017年期间SCI发文情况分析，以期为这些高校冲刺“一流”高校及学科建设给出具体策略，同时为政府导向性资助提供参考，提升我国医学水平国际影响力。方法 基于WoS及ESI数据库对这些高校发表的SCI论文相关数据，包括SCI论文产出量、篇均被引次数、高被引论文量、“H-指数”、基金资助情况及来源期刊影响因子等多种文献计量学指标进行数据检索及分析，探索这些SCI论文反映出的现状以及问题。结果 本研究中的高校均进入ESI数据库，ESI排名与US News、ARWU全球排名基本一致；部分院校的“临床医学（428名）”、“药理学与毒物学（94名）”已入围或者接近ESI全球1‰排名；高被引论文量与发文量总量的占比仍然低于国内平均水平；H指数与篇均被引成正比，与国内一流高校尚有差距。绝大部分论文受到国家级基金项目资助，但大量SCI文章来源期刊的影响因子不高。结论 这些研究结果表明，我国独立设置医科大学全球排名在近五年飞速发展，虽然与国际一流高校和学科尚有差距，但是潜力巨大。临床医学学科水平已达到国际一流水平，生物与生化等为代表的学科水平与国际水平在不断缩小差距。高校层面需要立足区位优势，政府需深化医学教育政策研究，发挥智库作用，共同提升我国医学水平国际影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To through the analysis of the SCI service of 20 independent medical universities in China during the 2013-2017 year period, it is expected to give specific strategies for the "first class" universities and discipline construction in these colleges and universities, and provide reference for the government oriented funding to improve the international influence of the medical level in our country. Methods Based on WoS and ESI database, this paper searches and analyzes the related data of SCI papers published by these colleges and universities, including the quantity of output, the citation of all articles, the fund support and other Bibliometrics indexes, and explores the status and problems of these SCI papers. Results All colleges and universities in this study have entered the ESI database, and the ranking of ESI is basically the same as the global ranking of US News and ARWU; the Clinical Medicine and Pharmacology & Toxicology of some colleges and universities has been in or near the global 1 per thousand of ESI, and the proportion of the quoted volume and the amount of the amount of writing is still lower than the domestic average; the H index and the article are directly proportional to the first class high in the country. There is still a gap in school. Most papers are funded by national fund projects, but a large number of SCI articles are not highly influential. Conclusion The results show that the global ranking of independent medical universities in China has developed rapidly in the past five years. Although there is still a gap with the international first-class universities and disciplines, it has great potential. The level of Clinical Medicine and Pharmacology & Toxicology has reached the international first-class level, and the level of science and technology, such as biology and biochemistry, has been narrowing. University level needs to be based on location advantages. The government needs to deepen the research on medical education policy, play the role of think tanks, and jointly enhance the international influence of China's medical level. |
|
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
