引用本文:吴春玲 何悦.某医学院校研究生学位论文盲审结果分析[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2019,18(10):1053~1064
某医学院校研究生学位论文盲审结果分析
Analysis of the concealed evaluation results of academic dissertations in a medical university
DOI:
中文关键词:  医学院校  学位论文  盲审
英文关键词:Medical university  Dissertation  Concealed evaluation
基金项目:
作者单位
吴春玲 何悦 陆军军医大学研究生院重庆 400038 
摘要点击次数: 51
全文下载次数: 40
中文摘要:
      目的 通过分析研究生学位论文盲审结果,探索学位论文分项质量差异,为提高学位论文质量提供参考。方法 选取某医学院校366篇学位论文1 051篇双盲评阅书,根据研究生学位论文评价指标体系,按总体质量和学科门类进行横向比较,采用Excel、SPSS 19.0进行数据统计分析。结果 不合格类中80%的论文选题较差,其规范性优良率仅为21%;在学科分项评价中,“选题”上基础医学组较差率为3.8%, “创新性与论文价值”上军事管理组较差率为5.6%,“基础知识与科研能力掌握”上基础医学组较差率为2.5%,“论文规范性”上军事管理组较差率为1.9%。结论 论文选题是学位论文的质量关键,基础医学和军事管理组应提高学位论文选题科学性和论文规范性。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the quality of dissertations by analyzing the concealed evaluation results of postgraduate dissertations, and to provide a reference for improving the quality of dissertations. Methods A total of 366 postgraduate dissertations and 1 051 concealed evaluation comments were collected from a medical university, and according to the evaluation index system of postgraduate dissertations, a horizontal comparison was made based on the overall quality and discipline. Excel and SPSS 19.0 were used for statistical analysis. Results Eighty percent of the dissertations in unqualified category had poor topic selection, and the excellent and good rate was only 21% in "Standardability". In discipline-based evaluations, the basic medicine group had a poor rate of 3.8% in "Topic Selection" and 2.5% in "Mastery of Basic Knowledge and Scientific Research Ability", while the military management group had a poor rate of 5.6% in "Innovation and Value" and 1.9% in "Standardability". Conclusion Topic selection is the key to the quality of dissertations, and the groups of basic medicine and military management should improve the scientificity of topic selection and the standardability of dissertations.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
微信关注二维码